Thread: Money in the Bank Discussion *Seventh Entrant Added*
View Single Post
Old 03-01-2008, 02:07 AM   #23
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,529
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeanderCarl View Post
Actually I HATE that idea, wish it had never occurred to me, and certainly don't want to see it come to fruition.
I've always wanted to see someone run down (Jamie Noble or a retired Ric Flair would be perfect for this), and steal the briefcase mid-match. The commentators don't have a clue what is going on, but there is a contract in there, and it turns out not to be worded as "the Money in the Bank winner gets to use this contract," but rather "the possessor of this contract." The wrestler who stole the title shot can now use it whenever they want.

The WWE can then hold another Money in the Bank Ladder Match at Backlash, this time worded correctly, so that there must be a winner who uses the title shot. The shot will last until WrestleMania XXIV, with two floating around, and you can decide whether or not you make MITB a WrestleMania concept, or a Backlash concept from now on.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote