View Single Post
Old 03-17-2008, 11:30 PM   #17
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xero Limit 126 View Post
You can't compare Triple H to Hogan if you're holding his in-ring and politicking against him. Hogan was just as bad, if not worse than Triple H in politicking and he's horrid in the ring. The ONLY thing Hogan could POSSIBLY have against Triple H is his mic/hype skills, but Triple H's well-roundedness more than cancels that out.
Whoa, I didn't say that Hulk Hogan was a better wrestler than Triple H ability-wise. There is no denying who was the bigger star, though. That is all I was referring to. People, like it or not, care about Hulk Hogan. As for Triple H? People unfortunately do not. Well, not as much as they should considering his "legacy."
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote