Thread: Looking at Angle...
View Single Post
Old 04-05-2008, 08:11 AM   #4
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Bullet View Post
It's a difficult argument from any angle (zing!) because there are no reliable stats for Angle's weight or anything, because he doesn't weigh in for anything...so there is no record keeping and this entire ordeal is just our speculation on the subject. So realistically there is no fact-based argument from any perspective.
Hence I used the phrase "implausible."

Synonyms unlikely, improbable, unbelievable.

But hey, let's look at your own evidence in terms of Cocksword's weight. Cocksword weighed in at 265, a guy who was not only taller than Angle but also bigger. So you're trying to say that Angle as trying to cut weight down to a weight comparable to Cocksword, which pretty much holds no water whatsoever. While you can argue there are no facts on either side, it doesn't make your argument strain credibility any less.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote