Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon
the Smackdown Title is not at World Title level imo either if you want to know. The only title that matters and means anything is the one that's on the show with the biggest guy in the company right now. The guy they push hard not just inside the ring, but outside the ring. The other two titles are just "hey we have two other timeslots during the week that need to have World Titles too" titles
|
I'm not completely disagreeing with you. I'd rather they had one World Champion for all three brands, too. I mean, I don't know which is meant to sound like it means more "WWE Champion" or "World Heavyweight Champion." Can't we just have the "WWE World Heavyweight Champion?"
Just to clarify, though, with the SmackDown! Title being on The Undertaker, and headlining WrestleMania, and the WWE Title being on Randy Orton, and him facing a "mid-carder" on RAW in Matt Hardy, has that effected your opinion of it at all? What about when it was the title on RAW?
Is it just the WWE Title full-stop, because of its history, or is it whichever belt is on the flagship show? Do PPVs then go into account? If so, it's probably worth pointing out that I don't think the WWE Championship has closed a PPV since No Mercy last year, when Randy Orton won the Last Man Standing Match. Survivor Series was the Hell in a Cell Match, Armageddon was Edge winning the title, The Royal Rumble was the Rumble, No Way Out was the RAW Elimination Chamber, and WrestleMania was Edge/Taker.
It seems the WWE changes their title focus every three years. I'm not going to be surprised if The Undertaker and Randy Orton swap shows in the rumoured upcoming draft.