Thread: Money in the Bank - pre 2005
View Single Post
Old 04-06-2008, 08:14 PM   #40
Jeritron
Get a poke on
 
Jeritron's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,234
Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
IC championship can be defended AND have the MITB. They did it last year with the US belt. Theres enough talent. It also doesn't have to be 7 or 8 men, it can be 6.
That's not a downfall of it, it's just what they've chosen to do. If that's a problem for someone they should blame WWE and not the match itself because both can coexist

Also, Money in the Bank should remain at wrestlemania and wrestlemania only. It's perfect


Also, the MITB is immensely awesome as it is, but it's got so much potential still. I mean, we've yet to see someone lose with their case, or do something unique. People cashing in unexpectedly will provide more great moments. We've yet to see someone use it that night, and yet to see someone wait all year and demand a wrestlemania title shot the year after. We've yet to see two compettitors tie by both falling with the case.
There's a lot of things to do, and a lot of great moments they can be used to accomplish which will give the match it's legacy like a royal rumble or king of the ring has had.

Have you caught on to the fact I love MITB yet?
Jeritron is offline   Reply With Quote