Quote:
Originally Posted by Splaya
Normally Noid, I agree with you. The problem though is that Vickie Guerrero getting massive heat and being GM is fine with me. Why would it not make sense for Vickie to be GM but Regal get fired. Regal fucked up, he deserves to be fired. However, Vickie has gotten heat from being a heel GM. She hasn't stepped in the ring, she didn't win the King of the Ring to help garner heat. She's done it all on her own.
|
I'm not really passionate on the Vickie Guerrero thing. She doesn't bother me as much as she does others, and I don't mind her being around. I think for someone who isn't a trained performer, she does what she needs to do very well. But I just don't see the consistency in Vickie Guerrero upsetting the Board of Directors, making wrestlers and fans unhappy with her decisions (just like Regal did) and abusing her power, and getting away with it while Regal is fired.
It's actually more a disagreement with how the WWE handled the William Regal situation I have than a disagreement with Vickie Guerrero being on the roster. Regal should have been put out with an injury, for actually suspended in kayfabe for failing a drug test, in my opinion. It gets rid of Regal, without bringing up the question of why the other GMs abusing their power (both Estrada and Guerrero are doing it, as well, at the moment) aren't getting punished.