TNA has a lot of problems, it certainly does. BUT, I'd like to say that TNA, on a whole, does more in 2 hours that's good than WWE does in 5 hours every week.
They're actually giving depth to the Women's Division. And that's a good thing. It's amazing, I think they have some of the best looking women, not to mention that 4 or 5 of their lady wrestlers can go. And I mean put on a legit good match.
TNA has an AWESOME Tag division. And now that the belts are finally around LAX's waist, I think we're going to see it be highlighted more instead of just something to be put around Tomko and AJ's shoulders. MCMG, LAX, 3D. I gotta tell you, I haven't been this optimistic about a tag division since the Attitude era. Plus they got quite a few other throw away teams like Rock'n'Rave and The Monsters.
On a pure roster stand point, they have some of the best and/or most over talent in the world; Kevin Nash, Angle, Cage, Booker, Sting, Steiner, say what you will but Styles is becoming better, guys who are on the verge of breaking out like James Storm and Robert Roode. Oh yeah and then there's Samoa Joe who internet smarks jerk off to.
I think the thing that's so hard about TNA is that there is so much to work with, but they drop the ball. But every once in a while you get a really good episode or two of Impact. TNA's biggest booking problem is over booking. Their gimmick matches are terrible and 9 times out of 10 have no connection with the angle what so ever.
As for not hearing "_____ should go to TNA and be used properly." Ever since Angle showed up, I think the world understands now that TNA is no better as using their talents than WWE is...except that TNA has less restrictions on what they can and can't do. Which in tern, I will say, I think TNA's matches, despite being overly complex with gimmicks all the time, are still on a whole much better than WWE's.
Last edited by The One; 05-23-2008 at 11:30 PM.
|