Thread: Pitchfork Lateralus review
View Single Post
Old 05-29-2008, 08:47 AM   #13
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indifferent Clox View Post
I'm not saying that's why you hate them, but that's the reason most people do.

They give a lot of records I like low ratings, but for the most part the albums they give good ratings to I really end up enjoying. But I love most music that seems to push music forward/ be intricate.
More people seem to hate them because they cater to douchebags, not indie. See, indie fans are douchebags, but not all douchebags are indie fans.

Also, greatly amused that you try to play both sides of the pitchfork card. Simultaneously, you like a lot of what they review well and a lot of what they don't. Seems more like a reflection of pitchfork being motr. It's especially amusing when you spent so much time proseltysing about how a non-elitist tries to love EVERYTHING.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote