Thread: Which browser is the least resource intensive?
View Single Post
Old 06-04-2008, 11:01 PM   #14
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DS View Post
I don't know what you guys are basing your opinions on but I have yet to find a benchmark yet that says that Opera 9.5 uses less resources/memory than Firefox 3.

I love Opera, and if it were as lightweight and as quick as Firefox 3 is, I'd use that. But let's not kid ourselves here.
"I like Opera, therefore it must be true."

But yeah, I've read a lot about Mozilla's speed in 3, and that it and Safari are comparable (And both tops), but I wasn't sure about resource intensive.
Kane Knight is offline