Thread: Which browser is the least resource intensive?
View Single Post
Old 06-04-2008, 11:54 PM   #19
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight View Post
"I like Opera, therefore it must be true."
Except I use FF2, mostly because of a few key addons.

I find FF2 on my system slow as fuck and find Opera more responsive, though I've only messed with it a little bit so longer sessions may give worse results. Just going by what I've heard.

Also haven't tried FF3 since the second or so beta but it was the same problem as 2.

Sure, FF is more responsive and less of a resource hog than IE, but that doesn't make it efficient.

If it weren't for the addons I'd dump Mozilla in a heartbeat. They pretty much fucked it up somewhere after 2.0.
Xero is offline