View Single Post
Old 06-24-2008, 08:40 AM   #38
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rectal Pertruder View Post
Why wouldnt it be? Its the best way to end it. Vince trying to give money away and the biggest prize gets stolen. All those wrestlers around the area at the same time. Its a big Who Did It angle. Plus, why would they rehash the same type of angle involving Vince and injuries or death.

Also, why do they even have 500,000$ on the stage if they were gunna do that whole setup. I think its about the money. Atleast i hope, because doing a " Someone tried to kill Vince " angle again seems so stupidly cheesy.
Personally, I think making the money part of the storyline, in a major sense, is stupid, because even if they aren't, wrestlers should be making out they make that much. You can't call a guy a "Superstar" and then have an angle about how he needs to pay off the mortgage.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote