Thread: Who would you rather see come back to wrestling?
View Single Post
Old 06-26-2008, 09:53 AM   #19
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesSteele View Post
Brock Lesnar by a billion miles. Brock could do anything in the ring, and he was developing into a good promo guy. Goldberg is worthless unless you book him as an unstoppable beast who buries everybody in 8 minutes or less. WWE didn't ruin Goldberg, WWE just exposed Goldberg for the worthless piece of shit he is. How can you expect a company to book you to bury everybody on their roster?
I agree that Goldberg was lost without the streak (to a point where his ring work was not good enough to justify his position as a main eventer), but there was no reason at all that Goldberg should not have won the World Heavyweight Championship at Summerslam 2003. The fans wanted to see it, and Goldberg looked like a beast in that match up until he ran into a sledgehammer and went down looking like a bitch.

I know you'll disagree because you're a Triple H mark, I'm not trying to take digs at Triple H here, he's better than Goldberg, it's just the booking on RAW around this time so damn horrible.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote