View Single Post
Old 07-03-2008, 02:51 PM   #4
BigDaddyCool
Pelvic Sorcerer
 
BigDaddyCool's Avatar
 
Posts: 64,762
BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by screech View Post
I agree that Chavo Morrison and Punk brought the belt credibility because they are/were rising stars. Kane is an established star, hence credibility (that is, being a dominant champion, although he could have done more than feud with fucking Chavo).

Mark Henry, on the other hand, is a piece of crap. He is by no means a star and only got the belt because of the Michael Hayes publicity nightmare. While he hasn't hurt the image yet, he will soon because he's fucking Mark Henry. This is just as bad as Khali being World Heavyweight Champion.
Kane isn't a star, he is a midcarder for life. No one pays money to see Kane. Granted no one pays money to see Mark Henry. But the point is, Henry isn't doing anything to the ECW title yet, and it is unfair to say he is going to ruin the title after he just got it.
BigDaddyCool is offline   Reply With Quote