[Reavant]

Originally Posted by Class Act Carl One thing I've learned though is that it's pointless arguing with fanboys because if you dare express an opinion slightly slanted away from "this film is 10/10, best film ever made in any genre ever, Nolan for Pope, Bale for President" then it will just be belittled and brushed aside, so I've said my piece. Not that it was right or wrong.

Ok shouldnt "fanboys" be the ones that are yelling for more two face?

Originally Posted by Xero Limit 126 Just want to say I agree with CAC. The Two Face character itself felt rushed at the end. It's like saying Joker should be kept out of the next movie(s) because he was such a large part of this movie (Ledger hoopla aside). They clearly left it open-ended on his part and I feel they should have done the same with Two Face. If they had a bit more development with Dent AS Two Face, I don't think I would have minded. I think I would have been satisfied with his role had he become Two Face around the mid-point of the movie. But that would have left out parts of Dent's development, which is why I feel Dent/Two-Face is a two movie character. .

With the way Joker ended the movie, it was clear that he was supposed to be involved in future movies. Think about the story the Joker and Batman could have with the joker trying to corrupt Batman now that all of Gothom hates him. The dialogue that would come from that situation would be cool.

To accomplish the feel and moral of the story in terms of the movie Two-Face needed to die. When it comes down to it, the movie wasnt about two face, it was about Gotham and the hero it needs. If Two Face lived, Gotham would know it, and theyre hope woud be crushed.

Which makes me wonder why Batman would say he killed Dent and all the people Dent killed, because you would think that would hurt the peoples hopes or watever as well, I mean I guess it woud unite them against him and want a legal hero but still.