Thread: Mat Moorgan Yay or Nay?
View Single Post
Old 08-14-2008, 11:21 AM   #7
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,623
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollermacka View Post
See what I'm trying to say is that men like Kurrgan are easliy forgetable. What I mean is that after the article I read about him, the hype I found on the internet about him compared to what I've seen in the ring it dosent match up. I could not see Silva as world champ and the though of Norton as a "main eventer" dosent appeal to many people, I dont see Matt Morrgan as the main draw of TNA let alone the "blueprint" of what a Big man should be.

Besides you can dance in the ring with clowns and entertain people but that dosent mean you should base the company around that. Kinda get what I mean?
He was hyped up big time when he was in WWE, but he got called up way too early and it showed. He may not be the "Blueprint", but he's damn good for a guy his size. I'm not saying Morgan should be the top guy in TNA, but he's good enough to at least be close (upper mid-card).

Just because he squashes jobbers doesn't mean he should be World Champion, but you have to remember that he is in TNA so that could (and probably will) happen eventually.
screech is offline   Reply With Quote