Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeritron
Addy2Hot, that's a stupid fuckin remark. You just have never liked the guy and you have a vendetta against him from the start. You seem to deny, or not like, when something positive happens involving him or the crowd. Guys like Benoit and Jericho were main eventers, and would have been if they were booked in it, but instead were given the world title and it was treated like a secondary title.
The WWE title meant as much int he grand scheme as the IC title did when they held that.
When you put a Cena/Batista fued, or a HHH/HBK, or Hogan/Rock fued on the card, and make it more important, then the title struggles. Not the champion. And as a result they are hurt.
|
Which remark, the last one? Or the one about the crowd?
A 'vendetta' - against a character in a TV show? I can't help but laugh at that comment. The fact that I pretty much agree with you for the rest of it also makes me laugh.
He wasn't built well enough for me to give a shit about him. If I watched Raw and Raw only and didn't indulge in the IWC then all I'd know about him is that he was at Survivor Series once, lost a lot to Chavo Guerrero and won MITB. Visited Raw now and then, mainly losing. He then came to Raw and won the title pretty much immediately in a heel like 'oppotunist' way.
Not really a lot to give a shit about there. Had they built him right and had him on the show beating main eventers then I'd give a shit.
That doesn't take away the fact that I don't think he has 'it'. I didn't think Kennedy does, MVP does or many of the 'new order'.
So how about you get down off your fucking throne and understand that I have an opinion about a wrestler that differs from yours. That's not a vendetta for gods sake, that's a DIFFERING OPINION.