Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The CyNick
The IC should, nay must stay on Randy Orton.
Assuming Foley and Orton go at it at the next PPV, Randy can put the title on the line, and Foley can talk about how he's going to take away Randy's most prized position. Obviously Foley will lose, and Orton will look like a champ. On top of that he will have the IC title, which will be elevated by being in this high profile feud. Orton can then move on to defend the title against whomever.
If you put the title on someone else it will move further down the card, why do that?
In terms of not defending the title very much. One of the things I think the WWE needs to get back to is makign title defenses (of any title) seem special. A heel especially should take advantage of the one defense in 30 days rule, and only defend it when he is forced to. That makes the struggle to get a title shot all the more important, and makes title defenses on PPVs seem like a big deal. When you have guys defending the title every week on TV it takes the title down and hurts the baility of the promotion to promote title matche son PPV.
|
Those are exactly my sentimonies.