View Single Post
Old 09-06-2008, 08:22 PM   #47
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by screech View Post
You raise a good point here, but it shouldn't take five stars leaving to convince them to better use their own talent. Their lackluster ratings and not-so-great buy rates should be enough of a kick in the ass. I know, I know they're making money but that doesn't mean they're doing everything they could be to produce good television and a good product.

Making money was step one. Now they have to move forward and improve; with or without these five talents.
You're exactly right, but cue Vince Russo talking about how important ratings are, and then talking about magazines when the point of low ratings is brought up.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote