Thread: Whaaa? *TNA SPOILERS*
View Single Post
Old 09-18-2008, 11:00 AM   #83
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool View Post
I don't care whose fault it is, TNA will not put over new talent when they can just hire WWE's spent talent. So saying Foley is going to put over new talent is crazy when TNA not put over their own talent for more than 3 seconds.
The WWE are a little better at putting over their younger stars, granted (especially now they're playing catch-up), but Mick Foley has always found ways around that. I mean, it seems the only guy he has ever beaten is Carlito. The man has lost to Val Venis, for crying out loud. Several times.

Foley would be the kind of guy to pull over Vince Russo, Jeff Jarrett, etc. and say "Look, I want to put this guy over." Given that Foley is a blessing to TNA, I think they'd let him do that.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote