Thread: A stupid question about Hurricane, Tats, and Trademarks...
View Single Post
Old 03-28-2004, 09:54 PM   #5
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Santo
I dunno... I think tats are off limits to trademark infringement, otherwise anyone with a Harley-Davidson tat would be in trouble.
I think in most cases that would be so, but the question would be specific. He's got a tat of a comic book character's logo while on live TV and playing a "super Hero" gimmick.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote