Thread: Dose it take a wrestler or a gimmick to get over?
View Single Post
Old 10-29-2008, 12:53 PM   #2
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I think the gimmick, charisma and their mic skills means more than the wrestler in Sports Enteratinment. There are very few exceptions where someone got really over mostly on their wrestling (Bret Hart, Chris Benoit).

Don't get me wrong, being a good wrestler can mean a lot, but it's not necessary. Sports Entertainment is about the character development, not the in-ring aspect.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote