Thread: There Might Be A Single World Title Again
View Single Post
Old 12-25-2008, 08:45 PM   #3
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool View Post
The US and IC titles are lower card titles, titles for the lower card to feud over, thus giving the lower card something to do, and a stepping stone for them to rise up the roster. By making them uppercard titles, they are moot. There are already 2 uppercard/mainevent titles.

A single world title would not make the undercard more relevant, in fact it would push the undercard off the back burn and into the trash.

The undercard and the undercard titles are like tire on a car, and currently the tire is flat. You are trying to repaint the car, put in a new engine, and upgrade the stereo by unify the mainevent title. None of that addresses the problem of the flat fucking tire.

Paying attetion to the undercard, booking matches with rising stars and veterans that aren't going anywhere is the key, not ignoring it an fucking up the mainevent.
William Regal is closer to being an upper mid-carder than a lower card wrestler. If you're referring to the undercard being everything but the main event, then fine, but considering that Regal won the King of the Ring this year, and CM Punk held two World Titles at some point in 2008, calling them "lower carders" is dismissing them a bit. Shelton Benjamin main evented PPVs this year, and has always been someone the WWE has flirted with pushing.

The car analogy is pretty horrible, but I'll address it anyway. OK, you repaint the car, put in a new engine, upgrade the stereo, and you still have a flat tire. True. But then all you have to fix up is a flat tire. The next time you save up, you can address that problem, and get something road worthy.

We both agree that the car needs a new tire. Let's drop that argument. All I am saying is that I think the order the WWE could fix things up could very well start from the top and work down. You're just saying it needs to be the other way.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote