Quote:
Originally Posted by .44 Magdalene
Ra's was a thinker within a plausible organization and an often agreeable viewpoint, foreign to help you stretch that disbelief. The Scarecrow was a psychologist with a drug that mirrors effects of real life hallucinogens. The Joker was a man with realistic psychological issues and a perspective that mimics real, accepted ideals.
You're suggesting that the next villain should be a chemically pumped up military project instead of, say, a self made man with high but nonetheless human potential strength that simply outthinks, then overpowers Batman out of morbid curiousity and the desire for challenge, leading out of something seemingly bigger to wear Batman down--setting up for other portions of the movie.
Y'know, like he was in the comics. But why do that, when we could pump him full of phlebotinum and make his strength super human? Yeah, that's realism at its finest.
|
haha... k your getting all hung up on the suggestion I made and just missing the point all together that wasnt even directed to you in the first place, but because of the other thread your all mad and trying to proove a point, but heres the deal, all those characters you just listed off arent necessarily that way in the comics especially in different books and renditions of each comic. For example the joker appear, acts and has a different orgin based on what brach of comic you read from batman or DC, but he and his story had to be made to work in the nolan universe.
but you said that scare crow had a drug that mimiced real life hallucinogens and thats true but say you wanted to go the serum route with bain. could you not have a serum that mimics the collective affects of testosterone, steroids and adrenaline??? which if mixed properly IN REAL LIFE can cause a person to physically perform way past their normal abilities.