View Single Post
Old 01-02-2009, 08:42 PM   #22
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight View Post
Wait...What? Didn't you just do exactly that to the above statement?

Besides, there's a large and tangible gap between telling a video game mag not to show Triple H in a vulnerable position and altering numbers like that.
No, I implied that it's not beyond the WWE to want to make their top stars look good over say secondary players who also make the WWE a lot of money. I didn't say they were doing it in this particular case.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote