Thread: MLB 2008-2009 Offseason Thread
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2009, 09:59 PM   #324
YOUR Hero
Adminstigator
 
YOUR Hero's Avatar
 
Posts: 102,491
YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)YOUR Hero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesus Shuttlesworth View Post
No I don't get what you are saying. They put everything into last season thinking it was their best shot, without thinking about this season. They probably thought half a season of Tex (and having their aging stars a year younger) was more likely to lead to a World Series than two seasons of Kotchman (with their aging stars a year older)
OK, I guess my thoughts on it weren't complete, I appologize. The Angels are abig market team and can afford to spend. Why they would give up a wanted prospect and then let Tex go doesn't make sense. They can afford to pay, even overpay for Tex. They are not say, Toronto taking a run at things and then having to fall back.
YOUR Hero is offline