Thread: Triple Crown in the WWE
View Single Post
Old 01-04-2009, 04:59 AM   #6
XL
Feeling Oof-y
 
XL's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,151
XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
And Noid's post is enough to tell me that I am in no way wrong to consider it impossible to win a true "Triple Crown" or "Grand Slam" in today's WWE.

There are far too many way's to do it. It's the same with the belts in general - I don't consider Jeff Hardy as a Main Eventer cos there's so much scope to be in the ME, just as I don't think I'll ever be that impressed by Edge's multiple World/WWE Title reigns.

Seriously, I'd consider TNA's Triple Crown (won by Styles, Angle, Joe, any others?) more prestigious within company kayfabe terms.
XL is offline   Reply With Quote