Thread: Most Overbooked Match?
View Single Post
Old 01-13-2009, 05:21 PM   #6
BigDaddyCool
Pelvic Sorcerer
 
BigDaddyCool's Avatar
 
Posts: 64,762
BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
In fact, they didn't think it through at all. I don't see how over the top battle royals can determine #1 contenders for a singles title. The way one would wrestle in a battle royal and the way one would wrestle in a singles match are vastly different. So add in TNA usual shannagans, how could having a reverse battle royal really determine "seeds" in a tourny?
BigDaddyCool is offline   Reply With Quote