Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeritron
By your definition Raw should be WWF, Smackdown should be WCW, and ECW should be ECW and/or TNA.
|
To an extent, but not quite...
-In my scenario, the "6's" on Smackdown would be used to put over "3's"...so that they could become "4's." In WCW, you almost never saw this happen. There were too many people worried about losing their 'spots' due to the fact that these "6's" THOUGHT that they were still "5's." In my scenario, the "6's" on Smackdown would "know their role." Furthermore - the "6's" would be surrounded by each other and since they would be of similar status, they could do free jobs to each other (i.e. sometimes, Big Show could defeat HBK and other times, HBK could beat Big Show). "6's" would usually get the better of "3's" unless a "3" showed great improvment in his ability/charisma.
-RAW would be a place where 4's could feud with other 4's so that they could both go over simultaneously. When ready, they could feud with othr '5's' or have random interpromotional feuds with "6's". So YES - this would be very similar to the old WWF.
-ECW would be a place where 'new guys' can get some more air time and can defeat some fairly established names if worth enough. A '2' in this case could also have a chance of becoming a '3' or a '4' if they use the extra TV time to re-invent themselves, etc. I don't see too much of a comparison to the old ECW or TNA. I do however, see this promotion as being as similar to Heat.....only difference being that new guys could legitimately get over here (I don't know if we saw too much of that in the old Heat days...I might be wrong though).