View Single Post
Old 02-21-2009, 02:18 AM   #23
Jeritron
Get a poke on
 
Jeritron's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,234
Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
It wasn't the worst Wrestlemania by any means. It very well could be the most dissapointing though.

It may be better than 11, or 9, but those came at a different time. They were "the lean years." They didnt have what WM2000 had to work with.
The product at the time was excellent, and constantly getting better. The roster depth and talent was incredible. The crowd was incredible.
It had so much more potential. In a great year, it may have ended up being the worst PPV. That's the exact opposite of what they should be aiming for.
It was saved from being the worst Wrestlemania by several things.
Young or new talent making their Wrestlemania debut, and two fantastic midcard matches (ladder and IC title) featuring future main eventers. That and the ability of the four men in the main event to work a solid match despite a poor build and booking.

Last edited by Jeritron; 02-21-2009 at 02:20 AM.
Jeritron is offline   Reply With Quote