Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooler Tom Schuler
1. That's retarded doesn't mean you're retarded. Though I'm starting to lean in that direction.
2. It's a comic, it's a joke. Do you know what jokes are? They stop being funny when you explain them, so I'll just let you think about the complex layers for a while. Eventually the humor may dawn on you. I wish you the best of luck.
3. You're only arguing your point now to save face. There is no possible way anyone, even the most musically inept could think those songs sound AT ALL similar. If you HONESTLY think that they do, then yes- I would then feel justified in calling you retarded. But I don't think you believe that. You just need to be a stubborn little bitch who stands by a point he made in haste that has no real basis in reality. It's this sort of shit that makes the majority of people on the forum dislike you. You have this rabid disregard for logic because you want to look right. You don't look right. You look like a jackass. Now you're trying to say "it's an opinion, I can't be wrong". It's not an opinion. Whether you like something or not, call that an opinion. But whether or not two things that can easily be compared on hundreds of different levels can be considered similar, that is something that can be clearly discerned. It is not an opinion. A is different than B. That's all there is to it.
|
Fine, let's roll with your 'logic' for a while. Despite the fact you revel in misology. So it is not an opinion, in that case, I am right and you are wrong. They sound similar. If you honestly think you can base someones retardation on the basis that they believe that two songs sound similar, then clearly you have no idea what being retarded actually is.
retarded
adjective
1. relatively slow in mental or emotional or physical development
I fail to see how this issue constitutes retardation. Learn what you are talking about before you try and argue a point.