View Single Post
Old 03-14-2009, 02:16 PM   #33
thedamndest
A Property of Matter
 
thedamndest's Avatar
 
Posts: 25,543
thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I would think the US title would be kayfabe closer to the European title than the ECW title is. For starters, the ECW title is a world title, so it's automatically higher than the IC belt. The US and IC belt tend to fluctuate in prestige depending on how they are booked, but due to the long-term history of the IC belt, I would go ahead and make the US belt the new Euro and have the ECW belt something that exists outside of this new Grand Slam. It sounds "cleaner" to say WWE/World title, IC, US, Tag, rather than throwing the ECW title in there as your lowest ranking belt in the Grand Slam. Arguably, it's not about "rank" and just about titles captured, but if that's the case then why not just change it so you have to capture every belt?
thedamndest is offline   Reply With Quote