Thread: Question about the Undertaker/Michaels' segment on Raw
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2009, 11:24 AM   #18
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xero View Post
If anything I think it hurts kayfabe itself but strengthens Michaels. Now whenever Taker uses mind games (assuming they do go the no-sell or no mind games route from here on out) the opponent is going to look weaker if they succumb to them.
Of course, Michaels doesn't really need to be strengthened.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool View Post
I liked it. Made prefect sence of Shawn to know Undertaker was there. They have both been around the block and know each other well. I would expect Taker to up the ante on mind games.
Well, that's a selective application of perfect sense. I mean, you've got guys who have known Michaels for years, but still can't figure out that stomping sound means a kick to the face is coming.

Again, not that I completely care. When I saw him pop up, I was thinking, "Wouldn't it be awesome if he said, 'He's behind me, isn't he?'"

I was just surprised that they actually did that.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote