View Single Post
Old 03-31-2009, 04:37 PM   #63
Ol Dirty Dastard
boop/bop/beep
 
Ol Dirty Dastard's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,453
Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Well even though I like Bret better, Michaels vs. Perfect is unfair to compare to Hart vs. Perfect cuz Perfect was a shell of himself. Michaels vs. Austin wasn't as good as Hart vs. Austin because Micahels back was fucked. I've only seen one of Michaels vs. Bulldog from 1992, obvious Bret's match was better because it was given more time and Bret was a better worker at thetime. Though I'll assume Michaels vs. Bulldog wasn't as good, there I have no excuse for Michaels.

And also, Bret and Owen had a WAY better match than Michaels vs. Owen.

But Michaels did get more out of Sid... that does say a lot.

I mean they were both fuckin phenomenal, that's what it comes down to really. They both stole the show on a consistant basis. They both just don't like each other and rightfully so, it's just the way it is. It doesn'tmean one was better than the other.
Ol Dirty Dastard is offline   Reply With Quote