Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Jones
1) Bret Hart will mainly be remembered for Montreal...thanks for his own lack of willingness to let go of the past.
|
You'd be amazed how many marks don't even know what happened in Montreal. My little brother knows Bret from his WCW tenure, and for being Owen's brother, for example. I think Bret'll be known for Montreal among smarks, but how much does that count for? I guess I'll disagree to a point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Jones
2) Stone Cold Steve Austin is greater than Hulk Hogan from both a wrestling and sports-entertainment perspective.
|
Agree, but I'm biased.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Jones
3) Kurt Angle was the greatest wrestler of all-time in the WWE.
|
Disagree. Shawn Michaels. Next.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Jones
4) If there are less titles in the WWE, the titles themselves will mean more.
|
Not really. WWE would still have to book the titles worth a damn, and they're bound to fuck that up no matter how many or few belts are actually floating around.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Jones
5) The winner of the royal rumble should become world champion of his brand and also headline Wrestlemania....against the world champion of the other brand. No titles would be on the line for that match, but the winner would receive some kind of trophy or prize. By having a format like this, the WWE can have one clear cut main-event match and champion of Wrestlemania.
|
Uhhhhhh. No thanks.