Thread: "I lost my smile"
View Single Post
Old 05-13-2009, 11:34 PM   #34
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Oh and for my two cents....

I really enjoy professional wrestling. Shawn Michaels is the best wrestler of all time and has been my favorite wrestler for about 15 years now. Bret Hart is a wrestler who was really good back in the day but not on HBK level then just kinda drifted out of the limelight. Therefore, Shawn Michaels is the man and is amazingly awesome and Bret Hart is just some guy who was very good at the form of entertainment that I enjoy. Not much more to me.

On a side note though, I never thought about this before...

Do you think the Montreal incident would still be talked about as much today or have been as big of an issue if Bret was not nearly as good of a wrestler as he was? As in... do you think the argument of who was a better wrestler really has THAT much of an effect on the whole right or wrong on both sides of the situation?

Your thoughts, TPWW.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote