Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
I think it's a huge loss for WWE. Let me preface this though by saying I AM NOT SAYING HE WAS THE NEXT ROCK OR PUTTING HIM ON THE SAME LEVEL AS THE ROCK IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM.
Okay, there. Now... I do think that WWE could use a "Rock-like" charcter, for lack of a better term. By that, I mean a charismatic, fun babyface that has a fun shtick that people can get behind (Ending his promos with the Mr. Kennedy................ Kennedy was just all kinds of awesome and I think if he had become the huge star that many think he would have, it would have been up there with the great "catchphrases" in wrestling history. Without a doubt.)
I think it's a huge loss because I personally can see no one on the WWE roster at the moment who has what it takes to be that guy. Kennedy was it.
|
Yeah, but it is not like they doing extremely worse without him. WWE has been pretty good w/o him when he was out. I am not hating on Kennedy. I have no idea how good he could be, but I don't think this is as big of a loss to WWE as other superstars would be.