Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shock&awe
i agree 100%, glycerine. it is soooo ****ing annoying. i would rather see a one on one match that MEANT SOMETHING than the same old bullshit, throw-away, pointless, meaningless tag team matches every week.
and to anyone who condons what theyre doing by showing bullshit on television and saving the matches PEOPLE WANT TO SEE for ppv, i say you are part of the problem. i havnt seen a ppv in years. why? because the television programming generally sucks. if wwe wants people to buy thier ppvs then they need to make the tv programs exciting again.
when was the last time a world title changed hands on RAW?
long ****ing time. why? because we dont get world title main events. we get meaningless tag team matches where it doesnt even matter who wins or loses.
|
The idea behind wrestling feuds is that they build them up during TV, and culminate with a big pay per view match that brings in the dough. Let's say Benoit was defending against Triple H at Backlash. If they gave us Triple H vs. Benoit on RAW, then it would lower the excitement for their match at the pay per view, because they'd already fought once. However, by having a match like Benoit and HBK vs. Triple H and Orton, they're letting the two men fight each other on TV without giving away what it's going to be like in the one-on-one situation.
It's just how pro wrestling works.