Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Sunday Night
The idea behind wrestling feuds is that they build them up during TV, and culminate with a big pay per view match that brings in the dough. Let's say Benoit was defending against Triple H at Backlash. If they gave us Triple H vs. Benoit on RAW, then it would lower the excitement for their match at the pay per view, because they'd already fought once. However, by having a match like Benoit and HBK vs. Triple H and Orton, they're letting the two men fight each other on TV without giving away what it's going to be like in the one-on-one situation.
It's just how pro wrestling works.
|
ohhhhhhhh, wellll, ok professor...
i still say they would make more money from ppvs if they made wrestling more exciting on a daily basis rather than showing the same predictable garbage every week. back in '98, '99, & 2000 i used to watch the ppvs. now, with the sorry state of regular tv programming the ppvs just dont seem worth it. and most people i know who USED to watch ppvs feel the same way. if what youre used to seeing isnt interesting why pay 40 bucks, especially when feuds and what-not are rarely settled at a ppv.