Thread: DISCUSSION - Would an "old school" vs. "New Blood" angle in the WWE be a good idea?
View Single Post
Old 06-30-2009, 07:10 PM   #2
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juan View Post
No. This idea didn't work in WCW, hasn't worked in TNA and I doubt it'd work in WWE.
You're probably right.

However - I was thinking that instead of there being a definitive "end" to the war (i.e. like we saw in the alliance), this war could ultimately just lead to the 'New Blood' having their own show......taking over RAW.

The 'oldschool' guys would then be moved to Smackdown.

A 'cold war' would exist between the two shows (i.e. tensions and mixed PPV's, random backstage assaults, etc.).

WCW and TNA failed, from what I understand, because the 'glass ceiling' was never really eliminated.....and ultimately, the 'wrong' guys ended up winning anyways and no one really went over.

In THIS scenario, I would have the 'New Blood' go over, and get the rights to RAW.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote