|
The term "better," in and of itself, suggests subjectivity. What's better to me may or may not be better to you. What makes something better to me may or may not make it better to you.
The point is that this thread is about arguing who's the better wrestler: Shawn or Bret. Unfortunately, you and I have gone off on a tangent and now we're debating what's a better way to judge who could be a better wrestler.
We should just agree to disagree. IMO, an "ability to draw" is something that cannot be measured. There are, I believe, too many variables (so many that I didn't even mention including people were just bored while someone was champion, a great Monday Night show was canceled so more people watched Raw, a better overall show quality including wrestlers and booking, etc.). I don't believe it's easy or possible to say, "we know Bret was responsible for this percentage of fans drawn to the house shows."
You believe that "ability to draw" is important and can be measured. That's fine.
Let's just both say that both points are equally valid.
|