Thread: Why does WWE bother...
View Single Post
Old 07-04-2009, 12:44 AM   #5
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,564
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Kane Knight is right -- merely semantics. Personally, I hate it when they use "unified" or "undisputed" in a title's name. It just seems redundant once the unification has been done. I'd rather they called the current Tag Team Champions the "WWE World Tag Team Champions."
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote