View Single Post
Old 07-15-2009, 02:41 AM   #9
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Yeah, I'm kinda torn too. Punk losing to Kane or something would piss me off. Their match a few weeks ago though was PPV quality. The way it should be with two guys on their level. If they can put on an awesome match, the length shouldn't be based on whether it's a PPV match or not. I hate that.

That match really was Morrison giving his all against Punk, a man who is kinda on the same level as him even since back in their ECW days, but has just gotten the breaks that Morrison hasn't gotten. I usually hate when the champ loses on a regular basis but this is different than his reign on Raw. Considering Morrison won with a rollup, it looks like they're making it seem like Punk is having to give more than he feels he should to beat Morrison but Morrison is just like his Bane and he's just a thorn in his side.

It's not so unrealistic and retarded. I actually think it's amazing booking.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote