Thread: could TNA win by getting sleazy?
View Single Post
Old 07-19-2009, 11:58 AM   #38
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kareru View Post
TNA Impact on 7/9 drew a final 1.2 cable rating (rounded up from a 1.17) with 1.7 million viewers. The show did a 0.84 in males 18-34 and 1.04 in males 35-49.

WWE Superstars on 7/9 drew a final 0.8 cable rating.

ECW on SyFy on 7/9 drew a final 0.7 cable rating. The show was out of its normal timeslot.

WWE Monday Night Raw on 7/6 drew a final 3.6 cable rating with 5.15 million viewers.

WWE Friday Night Smackdown on 7/3 drew a final 1.6 broadcast rating with 2.61 million viewers.



it will take tna a while to catch up with raw, but dixie carter said the next step is to beat smackdown and it is totally possible
Even if those numbers were true, Volare's right. Smackdown's doing good considering it's a bad night. Impact is doing poorly (by comparison to WWE) considering it's a much better night. It's totally possible, but not totally likely. TNA's been drawing similar numbers for ages now.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote