Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
1) The all caps wasn't an appeal to emotion, it was me feeling the need to capitalize something I've had to say way too many times to try to get the point across.
|
I was referring to your content, the ALL CAPS thing was jest. You were still appealing to emotion, a logical fallacy. I wasn't pointing out you being emotional.
Quote:
2) Whether it would be illegal for the guys running the show to have a 17 year old play the decoy or not isn't the issue? Now who's dodging?
|
NoJabba.
Quote:
Forget there is even a show. Let's just say it's an elaborate plot by a 17 year old posing as a 13 year old. No one else is involved. Since he's simply playing a "character", if the guy shows up, does your "it's just a character" argument hold up?
|
The kid's underage and in danger so no, although the situation would be different - the guy would still be interacting with an underage child, actual age be damned. So yeah, he gets the flat mattress.
See how that works? Critical thinking, a just evaluation without some zero tolerance, interactionist bullshit? It's really not that hard.