Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanso
They should have never taken Zeke away yet...they had major potential.
|
Yes and no, in my opinion. I don't have a problem with Big Zeke, and I loved the touch he added to The Kendrick character (it makes so much sense for a smarter smaller guy to enlist the help of a bad-ass), but Kendrick's best success in the character came from himself. His promo about "re-defining" war, while made extra awesome by Zeke reading "Cat in the Hat" and knowing exactly what Kendrick was talking about, didn't need Zeke. Kendrick also got his fall in the WWE Title Scramble Match without Zeke.
I think Brian Kendrick's character was ready to move on without Zeke, and that pulling Zeke from him might have even been a kayfabe reason for explaining his punishment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
lol. That could be amazing. Kendrick running attack ads, coming out to the ring every week and campaigning to the world why he, not Lawler, should be Mayor of Memphis. Sounds very Kaufman-like.
|
I was half-joking when I suggested this, but it could actually work. I mean, it might even earn the WWE some mainstream attention. I'm thinking that jobbing to Lawler was just the WWE's way of reminding Kendrick that they can give him a lot, but they can also take it away, though.