Originally Posted by Noid:
Tedious, you are a retard.
Ahem. The "I have no response to what you said so I will briefly insult you and then ignore your points" gimmick belongs to Kane Knight.
Originally Posted by 4 knuckles up:
Please get the sand out of your vagina. If I wish to talk about the unification of any belts, on a wrestling discussion board, I will. 
We're having a discussion on Gail Kim being underutilized. I think out of all the divas on RAW, Smackdown, ECW, there is just enough talent for one belt.
And if, in a discussion about the underutilization of any given female wrestler being underutilized, you advocate the elimination of the one thing leading to more utilization of female wresters in WWE, I'm going to call it garbage and suggest you stop doing it. That being said, it isn't a matter of how much talent there is, it's a matter of how the TV time is divided. Without a belt to contend for, female wrestlers will have nothing to do on their own and will be relegated to being strictly valets, and fueds involving the men they're attached to. There is an ostensible brand separation, and therefore a woman who does not have a belt to go after will not be used at all.