Thread: 2nd Title for ECW
View Single Post
Old 08-11-2009, 12:43 PM   #43
thedamndest
A Property of Matter
 
thedamndest's Avatar
 
Posts: 25,543
thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)thedamndest makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
I mean, who else is there? You've got solid veterans like William Regal and Goldust, but they haven't been established enough to hold a World Title. Who are you going to feed to them to make them look capable? The young guys? Speaking of which, you give a guy like Sheamus the ECW Title, and he looks good, fair enough, but is he ready? He'll then go over to RAW or SmackDown! and win the US or IC Title, and the cycle continues. The ECW Title might as well be the FCW Heavyweight Title if this is the case.
The way they're booking it now they're having it so the established guys that didn't get over or didn't win the big one but were upper mid-carders to main eventers win the ECW title. That makes the title look good. It also ensures you don't give it to someone who isn't over or isn't going to be able to hang on the road or whatever other issue would arise. The right path is what they're doing now. Let the new guys debut, see if they make waves, then take them to Raw or SD and have them feud for an established belt. There is no need to create a new belt. The new belt would NEVER be respected.
thedamndest is offline   Reply With Quote