Thread: inglourious basterds
View Single Post
Old 08-24-2009, 12:41 AM   #49
Droford
 
Posts: 52,478
Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple A View Post
I am not a big fan of spoilers, ASSHAT.
the same information (IB does almost $40 million due to Brad Pitt but he was only in 1/2 the movie) was in every news piece I read about this weekend's box office numbers.

Hell, if you had any general knowledge of the movie you would have known there were two concurrent storylines involving seperate groups of characters, so it wouldn't be hard to figure out that Brad Pitt isn't in the majority of a 2 1/2 hour film. Blame whoever designed the ad campaign for totally ignoring the other storyline and making it seem like the movie was 2 1/2 hours of Brad Pitt killin Nahzees.

I didn't see posting that as being a spoiler. OMG, BRAD PITT ISN'T ON SCREEN EVERY SINGLE SECOND!
Last edited by Droford; 08-24-2009 at 12:44 AM.
Droford is offline   Reply With Quote