Thread: Hell in a Cell
View Single Post
Old 09-20-2009, 09:35 AM   #12
Swiss Ultimate
Amazon Affiliate
 
Swiss Ultimate's Avatar
 
Posts: 42,694
Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAMN iNATOR View Post
Hmm, I wonder who would be willing to and capable of doing just that? Oh, yes, that's right, silly me. The Undertaker. Being a damn near 18 year veteran of the WWE, I'm sure 'Taker will have no problem whatsoever putting Punk over.



I honestly don't see the scenario you described playing out at HiaC in 2 weeks' time. Plus, I don't see how a Punk win there will be able to be described as "less-than-legit", especially seeing as—*GASP*—there's no DQ's or Count-Outs in HiaC matches, thus if Punk goes over, it will be by Submission or Pinfall, regardless of whether or not interference and/or a "foreign object" come into play, anything goes, so basically whatever Punk does won't matter, because Punk winning would be perfectly legitimate. This is one case where the ends really do justify the means, and it won't taint the record books one bit as to who wins/loses.

Thanks, BTW, for allowing me to point out those huge glaring flaws in your logic.
First, I never said Undertaker would have a problem putting Punk over. I think Undertaker is a professional and would do whatever it takes to entertain the fans and build up the future generations.

And as far as "clean" goes, why yes, being this is a NO DQ environment does not mean one person can not go over clean. For instance, HHH a heel, went over clean when he faced Mick Foley in the cell. NO DQ or not, HHH went in one-on-one and defeated Foley in the match. In any environment interference is the one thing that ruins the victory, so if Kane hitting a tombstone of Undertaker in the first cell so that Shawn could get the win to you is "clean" or "legitimate" I see where you're coming from.

My definition of "clean" is more of a "how would cena win" type deal. Never with planned interference, sometimes with weapons (if weapons are allowed or he's "been pushed to the edge"), occasionally against all odds and usually decisively.

Shawn Michaels was about to lose the first Hell in a Cell and he won because the WWF wanted to give Kane a big entrance.

HHH defeated Cactus Jack as cleanly and legitimately as one can in such a match not resorting to the use of outside interference.

CM Punk, in my opinion, is going to fall under the Shawn Michaels category if he wins at all.

edit: And you're welcome.

Last edited by Swiss Ultimate; 09-20-2009 at 09:38 AM.
Swiss Ultimate is offline   Reply With Quote