04-20-2004, 12:47 AM
|
#4
|
Mas Vagina Porfavor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glycerine
Nowadays it seems to get ratings it takes the current big thing and reproduces it on raw. even it really has nothing to do with wrestling.
RAW has had its highest ratings in a long time, don't change anything.
a great way to boost ratings would be title changes with 8 titles, one belt should change hands a week.
Many disadvantages to that. RAW has 4 titles, and if there were 4 more added then all the title belts would lose their crebility because there's so many. People would lose track of who's champion if the belts change so frequently. Plus there would be no non-title matches.
another thing would be more blood and darker themes but not the same dark themes. such as matt hardy could go gothic but not be funny. thats another thing they take some serious charecters and take the credibility away.
Jeff Hardy was gothic-like, look what happened to him.
More stipulation matches, ladder, shaved head, etc. ON RAW! not on ppv. ppvs don't have these either. the ppv should be straight storyline match ups the raw and smackdwon should be kick butt stipulation matches.
PPV events would lose their exitement if stipulation matches were used on weekly shows. Plus many of the stipulation matches would go stale if they're used frequently on TV.
pushing the limit by using hardcore moves. in stead of releasing these people they release, have them be in hardcore matches, if WWE doesnt care enough to keep em on then they should just let em do the dangereous stuff, then maybe there charecter will develop.
Hardcore matches would further prove that the lousy wrestlers CAN'T WRESTLE.
every charecter needs to be a clear cut person. garrison and cade.. i know who they are.. but what is there point? they don't need a gimmick neccesarily just.. character.
When Garrison Cade starts getting standing ovations for being himself, let me know.
|
|
|
|